why do people have to be so low...
Moderators: PEPCORE, SweetPeaPod, BreakforceOne, JohnMerrik
43 posts
• Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
- HORSE FORCE
- The Horse Lord!
-
- Posts: 556
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 12:00 am
- Location: Killwaukee, Wisconsin
i usually give myself 10's cause i love my own music. other people either dont like it, or they want their track to be ranked higher, so they give it a 1. i dont care what the ratings mean anymore.
now i make tracks and dont release them to anyone cause then the art is for me. pure masturbation. its like that movie with the poet who writes all this beautiful poetry and never releases it because he hates humanity.
okok, i know that comes off as pretentious. i am not really like that. i do hate humanity though.
now i make tracks and dont release them to anyone cause then the art is for me. pure masturbation. its like that movie with the poet who writes all this beautiful poetry and never releases it because he hates humanity.
okok, i know that comes off as pretentious. i am not really like that. i do hate humanity though.
- hardon collider

-
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 12:00 am
- Location: Cincinnati, OH
HORSE FORCE wrote:okok, i know that comes off as pretentious. i am not really like that. i do hate humanity though.
you only hate humanity because it's trendy
fuck shit
TBH, I was getting really sick of seeing those same 5 songs on the main page every time i went on the site, needs to be mixxed up a bit, and If you look at like the top 20/30 all the songs there are prety much killer
THese are the rules for IMDB, and I think the voting system needs to be changed here.
The formula for calculating the Top Rated 50 Titles gives a true Bayesian estimate:
weighted rating (WR) = (v ÷ (v+m)) × R + (m ÷ (v+m)) × C
where:
R = average for the movie (mean) = (Rating)
v = number of votes for the movie = (votes)
m = minimum votes required to be listed in the Top 50 (currently 1000)
C = the mean vote across the whole report (currently 6.
for the Top 50, only votes from regular voters are considered.
In order to appear in the Bottom 10 Titles chart the title must have received at least 50 votes.
THese are the rules for IMDB, and I think the voting system needs to be changed here.
The formula for calculating the Top Rated 50 Titles gives a true Bayesian estimate:
weighted rating (WR) = (v ÷ (v+m)) × R + (m ÷ (v+m)) × C
where:
R = average for the movie (mean) = (Rating)
v = number of votes for the movie = (votes)
m = minimum votes required to be listed in the Top 50 (currently 1000)
C = the mean vote across the whole report (currently 6.
for the Top 50, only votes from regular voters are considered.
In order to appear in the Bottom 10 Titles chart the title must have received at least 50 votes.
just memes and donks these days
http://www.soundcloud.com/sherekahnn
http://www.soundcloud.com/sherekahnn
- Feutus Lapdance

-
- Posts: 1107
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 12:00 am
- Location: Maastricht
- Average track rating: 4.0/5 out of 1 votes
S2K08 wrote:TBH, I was getting really sick of seeing those same 5 songs on the main page every time i went on the site, needs to be mixxed up a bit, and If you look at like the top 20/30 all the songs there are prety much killer
THese are the rules for IMDB, and I think the voting system needs to be changed here.
The formula for calculating the Top Rated 50 Titles gives a true Bayesian estimate:
weighted rating (WR) = (v ÷ (v+m)) × R + (m ÷ (v+m)) × C
where:
R = average for the movie (mean) = (Rating)
v = number of votes for the movie = (votes)
m = minimum votes required to be listed in the Top 50 (currently 1000)
C = the mean vote across the whole report (currently 6.
for the Top 50, only votes from regular voters are considered.
In order to appear in the Bottom 10 Titles chart the title must have received at least 50 votes.
I have 2 problems with joure system.
1. People dont vote tat mutch.
2.Do we realy want to make some kind of top of the pops? Im not looking for that.
Better would be a deformath ranking. Let the Modderators select some tracks that are well produced and put them on a side of the frond page. So artist that are good (not me, I suck) get somme atension to.
- producer_snafu
- free pwny ridez!
-
- Posts: 1075
- Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:00 am
hardon collider wrote:because people fucking suck. long live machines.
i think this applies to you tbh
\((( "D )))/ Yay clouds! ☁ ☁ ☁ ☁ ☁
S2K08 wrote:TBH, I was getting really sick of seeing those same 5 songs on the main page every time i went on the site, needs to be mixxed up a bit, and If you look at like the top 20/30 all the songs there are prety much killer
Or just change what that Top 5 means. How about Top 5 this month/week?
Better yet, get rid of this gay ass rating competition bullshit. I really don't see how it benefits anyone.
- yonosoyelquesoy

-
- Posts: 281
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 12:00 am
a 1 is a 10
divtech wrote:yeahh jou right, i should just stop bitching haha
You should be glad , because it´s the jealousy of people that cannot drop a decent beat in their whole lifetime...
Haters are everywere in concerts(they yell that you suck or the classic booouu! , bottles in your head, rotten potatoes , whatever...), in mental houses, in work, I mean that is a compliment a 1 is kind of a 10 in a bizarre twisted way you know...
- yonosoyelquesoy

-
- Posts: 281
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 12:00 am
self pleasure
HORSE FORCE wrote:i usually give myself 10's cause i love my own music. other people either dont like it, or they want their track to be ranked higher, so they give it a 1. i dont care what the ratings mean anymore.
now i make tracks and dont release them to anyone cause then the art is for me. pure masturbation. its like that movie with the poet who writes all this beautiful poetry and never releases it because he hates humanity.
okok, i know that comes off as pretentious. i am not really like that. i do hate humanity though.
Masturbation, Im with you on that one.
- cuttingagent

-
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 12:00 am
- Location: hardcorvallis, oregon
i think we are failing to consider the possibility that someone disliked the track so much they felt it deserved a one out of ten. i mean, shit guys, it's possible.
but this could just be penis envy talking, as my peepee is so small i could only receive deep throat if it was from a four year old.
but this could just be penis envy talking, as my peepee is so small i could only receive deep throat if it was from a four year old.
([agent.)]
- johndecision

-
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 12:00 am
why dont you get rid of the option for people to give a rating of less than 5 if its such a crime against humanity. or better yet, fuck off and stop focus grouping your music via internet message boards.
- SweetPeaPod

-
- Posts: 675
- Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:00 am
- Location: Tri-State
horse force hates humanity 'cause he's a horse.
you, you see what i did right there? did ya.... did ya see what i just did?
it all makes sense now.
you, you see what i did right there? did ya.... did ya see what i just did?
it all makes sense now.
- PEPCORE
- Normal moderator and owner
-
- Posts: 2320
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 12:00 am
- Average track rating: 4.7/5 out of 6 votes
larsby wrote:SweetPeaPod wrote:horse force hates humanity 'cause he's a horse.
you, you see what i did right there? did ya.... did ya see what i just did?
it all makes sense now.
But horses make delicious hamburgers!
And sausages too.
43 posts
• Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 97 guests



