censorship
Moderators: PEPCORE, SweetPeaPod, BreakforceOne, JohnMerrik
36 posts
• Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
censorship
ok, for the sake of future refrence, can sombody please explain the crieteria necessary to have a topic locked?
or please direct me to the forum rules as i can't find a link.
this may be noob stuff but this is the only forum i have ever used.
or please direct me to the forum rules as i can't find a link.
this may be noob stuff but this is the only forum i have ever used.
- producer_snafu
- free pwny ridez!
-
- Posts: 1075
- Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:00 am
this "Chubby" cunt locked matt's thread that was deleted by who i dunno, but because it was just gonna be people taking stabs at matt.
more drama for this board that it doesn't need.
as far as rules apply, just use your common sense for the time being in till some one gets around to it
more drama for this board that it doesn't need.
as far as rules apply, just use your common sense for the time being in till some one gets around to it
\((( "D )))/ Yay clouds! ☁ ☁ ☁ ☁ ☁
- PEPCORE
- Normal moderator and owner
-
- Posts: 2320
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 12:00 am
- Average track rating: 4.7/5 out of 6 votes
I deleted the thread, the thread was doing nothing but creating more animosity on this board, letting it stand locked, there would emerge other topics replying to that one.
ok,
fine, i understand why mr bleaks thread was locked and removed. im sure this beef which has been going on for a while could be resloved with private messages, pillow fights or just plain old hate-fucking.
However i dont see why the 'oven chips' topic was locked. it does appear to be a 3 post thang, but it also started a conversation...and my endorsement of the batterd mars bar- (one of the few good things to emerge from the uk. soft, creamy and warm. the batterd mars bar kept me warm through many chilly bristolian winters)
i dont think it was wrong to discuss this in the 'general' forum, though i may be wrong.
but i put this question to you: what is necessary censorship and what isnt? when does it go from simply keeping the peace to cruel nazi bollocks? and who censors the censors? how do you maintian consintancy? is it even possible?... where does it end?
a point in case would be that 'we can invade..' post can be considered 'incitement to treason' which in the uk holds the penelty of life imprisionment. Maybe that should be locked for our own protection? maybe you should report me and the others to interpol? maybe you should join in and hatch some plans?
other subjects i have found on this forum include endoresment of drugs, critique of religion, and white people using the word 'nigger'
please note that im not trying to have a go at you guys. but the whole censorship thing has become an issue in my neck of the woods and i would like some opinions from those who are in a position to censor.
fine, i understand why mr bleaks thread was locked and removed. im sure this beef which has been going on for a while could be resloved with private messages, pillow fights or just plain old hate-fucking.
However i dont see why the 'oven chips' topic was locked. it does appear to be a 3 post thang, but it also started a conversation...and my endorsement of the batterd mars bar- (one of the few good things to emerge from the uk. soft, creamy and warm. the batterd mars bar kept me warm through many chilly bristolian winters)
i dont think it was wrong to discuss this in the 'general' forum, though i may be wrong.
but i put this question to you: what is necessary censorship and what isnt? when does it go from simply keeping the peace to cruel nazi bollocks? and who censors the censors? how do you maintian consintancy? is it even possible?... where does it end?
a point in case would be that 'we can invade..' post can be considered 'incitement to treason' which in the uk holds the penelty of life imprisionment. Maybe that should be locked for our own protection? maybe you should report me and the others to interpol? maybe you should join in and hatch some plans?
other subjects i have found on this forum include endoresment of drugs, critique of religion, and white people using the word 'nigger'
please note that im not trying to have a go at you guys. but the whole censorship thing has become an issue in my neck of the woods and i would like some opinions from those who are in a position to censor.
- producer_snafu
- free pwny ridez!
-
- Posts: 1075
- Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:00 am
kvkvg wrote:ok,
fine, i understand why mr bleaks thread was locked and removed. im sure this beef which has been going on for a while could be resloved with private messages, pillow fights or just plain old hate-fucking.
However i dont see why the 'oven chips' topic was locked. it does appear to be a 3 post thang, but it also started a conversation...and my endorsement of the batterd mars bar- (one of the few good things to emerge from the uk. soft, creamy and warm. the batterd mars bar kept me warm through many chilly bristolian winters)
i dont think it was wrong to discuss this in the 'general' forum, though i may be wrong.
but i put this question to you: what is necessary censorship and what isnt? when does it go from simply keeping the peace to cruel nazi bollocks? and who censors the censors? how do you maintian consintancy? is it even possible?... where does it end?
a point in case would be that 'we can invade..' post can be considered 'incitement to treason' which in the uk holds the penelty of life imprisionment. Maybe that should be locked for our own protection? maybe you should report me and the others to interpol? maybe you should join in and hatch some plans?
other subjects i have found on this forum include endoresment of drugs, critique of religion, and white people using the word 'nigger'
please note that im not trying to have a go at you guys. but the whole censorship thing has become an issue in my neck of the woods and i would like some opinions from those who are in a position to censor.
just taking a wild guess here but i think it was locked to mock the fact that the other thread that it originally mocking was being locked.
i thought it was funny.
but if it's that big of a deal then just send peep a message to unlock it.
\((( "D )))/ Yay clouds! ☁ ☁ ☁ ☁ ☁
producer_snafu wrote:kvkvg wrote:ok,
fine, i understand why mr bleaks thread was locked and removed. im sure this beef which has been going on for a while could be resloved with private messages, pillow fights or just plain old hate-fucking.
However i dont see why the 'oven chips' topic was locked. it does appear to be a 3 post thang, but it also started a conversation...and my endorsement of the batterd mars bar- (one of the few good things to emerge from the uk. soft, creamy and warm. the batterd mars bar kept me warm through many chilly bristolian winters)
i dont think it was wrong to discuss this in the 'general' forum, though i may be wrong.
but i put this question to you: what is necessary censorship and what isnt? when does it go from simply keeping the peace to cruel nazi bollocks? and who censors the censors? how do you maintian consintancy? is it even possible?... where does it end?
a point in case would be that 'we can invade..' post can be considered 'incitement to treason' which in the uk holds the penelty of life imprisionment. Maybe that should be locked for our own protection? maybe you should report me and the others to interpol? maybe you should join in and hatch some plans?
other subjects i have found on this forum include endoresment of drugs, critique of religion, and white people using the word 'nigger'
please note that im not trying to have a go at you guys. but the whole censorship thing has become an issue in my neck of the woods and i would like some opinions from those who are in a position to censor.
just taking a wild guess here but i think it was locked to mock the fact that the other thread that it originally mocking was being locked.
i thought it was funny.
but if it's that big of a deal then just send peep a message to unlock it.
ah, that joke went over my head...
not that big of a deal, im just paranoid after spending two weeks watching china censor shit, and over here, the avrage length of the simpsons is 19mins instead of 23 due to censorship... and besides i was in the middle of advocating the batterd mars bar...the way the chocolate melts into the batter, creating a sensual marble effect. the nugat is firm, the chocolate is soft and the batter is crispy. it will give you chest pains but you have to gobble it like sweet cock of death that it is.....
- NoBusinessLike

-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 12:00 am
- Location: Perth, Australia
kvkvg wrote:and my endorsement of the batterd mars bar- (one of the few good things to emerge from the uk. soft, creamy and warm. the batterd mars bar kept me warm through many chilly bristolian winters)
and besides i was in the middle of advocating the batterd mars bar...the way the chocolate melts into the batter, creating a sensual marble effect. the nugat is firm, the chocolate is soft and the batter is crispy. it will give you chest pains but you have to gobble it like sweet cock of death that it is.....
Yeah, I read your reply in the oven chips thread (which I too thought had potential) - I imagine that you would need to keep count of the number of those fuckers you'd consumed. I stand at 0 for both cocaine and battered mars bar. Fucking hilarious descriptions of the tasty chocolate treat though.
- NoBusinessLike

-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2008 12:00 am
- Location: Perth, Australia
What's with this 'three poster' stuff? Is it quite common for people to register here and post a maximum of three messages, just to meet the requirements for downloading from the website? (Admittedly, I registered because I had to if I wanted to download music, but so far this place has been good for a laugh and music discussion, so I doubt I'll be buggering off any time soon)
NoBusinessLike wrote:What's with this 'three poster' stuff? Is it quite common for people to register here and post a maximum of three messages, just to meet the requirements for downloading from the website? (Admittedly, I registered because I had to if I wanted to download music, but so far this place has been good for a laugh and music discussion, so I doubt I'll be buggering off any time soon)
Yea pretty much.
Sometimes It's not bad when they actually look around and post helpful comments in random sections. But its rather annoying when they make 3 useless threads or just go straight for the jugular in the "introduce yourself thread" and go "hi" "hi" "hi YAY I'm gonna go DL NOWZZZ"
- PEPCORE
- Normal moderator and owner
-
- Posts: 2320
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 12:00 am
- Average track rating: 4.7/5 out of 6 votes
I closed the thread with the three poster, i saw someone asking for closing, and in my haste i didnt read beyond, so i can reopen it if you want?, and i will not be so fast in locking shit, maybe a good thread will emerge, and it had nothing to do with mocking or whatever, i don't even understand what the whole bullshit here is about, i just delete stuff and lock shit that i find apropriate, as i think all the other mods do to.
And as said if you really want it opened again or something different you ant done, just pm anyone with the power to do so, and i think it will probably be done, reasonable stuff ofcourse, not like can you please delete the every acount here.
And as said if you really want it opened again or something different you ant done, just pm anyone with the power to do so, and i think it will probably be done, reasonable stuff ofcourse, not like can you please delete the every acount here.
- PEPCORE
- Normal moderator and owner
-
- Posts: 2320
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 12:00 am
- Average track rating: 4.7/5 out of 6 votes
sevendeary wrote:so if i said i wanted matt bleak to sodomize me while cat-grrl took a dump on my chest and thallium licked it off then it would not be censorshipped?????
COOOLLLLL!!!!!!!!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
No that would just be weird.
36 posts
• Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 522 guests


