why do people have to be so low...

Shoot the shit, and talk about whatever here.

Moderators: PEPCORE, SweetPeaPod, BreakforceOne, JohnMerrik

The Horse Lord!
User avatar
Posts: 556
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 12:00 am
Location: Killwaukee, Wisconsin

Postby HORSE FORCE » Thu May 28, 2009 4:12 am

i usually give myself 10's cause i love my own music. other people either dont like it, or they want their track to be ranked higher, so they give it a 1. i dont care what the ratings mean anymore.

now i make tracks and dont release them to anyone cause then the art is for me. pure masturbation. its like that movie with the poet who writes all this beautiful poetry and never releases it because he hates humanity.

okok, i know that comes off as pretentious. i am not really like that. i do hate humanity though.

Pwncore Member
User avatar
Posts: 197
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 12:00 am
Location: Cincinnati, OH

Postby hardon collider » Thu May 28, 2009 4:23 am

HORSE FORCE wrote:okok, i know that comes off as pretentious. i am not really like that. i do hate humanity though.


you only hate humanity because it's trendy
fuck shit

Most Valuable Poster!
Posts: 866
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 12:00 am
Location: Orange County CA

Postby divtech » Thu May 28, 2009 4:25 am

aw shit i didnt know it was trendy now, fuck im running out of self-inhibiting ideals

mayble ill just start praying to obama
no ones doing that

Pwncore Member
User avatar
Posts: 197
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 12:00 am
Location: Cincinnati, OH

Postby hardon collider » Thu May 28, 2009 4:55 am

it worries me that somebody in this world very well could have done that before
fuck shit

teh_pwner
Posts: 793
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 12:00 am

Postby S2K08 » Thu May 28, 2009 9:27 am

TBH, I was getting really sick of seeing those same 5 songs on the main page every time i went on the site, needs to be mixxed up a bit, and If you look at like the top 20/30 all the songs there are prety much killer

THese are the rules for IMDB, and I think the voting system needs to be changed here.

The formula for calculating the Top Rated 50 Titles gives a true Bayesian estimate:

weighted rating (WR) = (v ÷ (v+m)) × R + (m ÷ (v+m)) × C

where:
R = average for the movie (mean) = (Rating)
v = number of votes for the movie = (votes)
m = minimum votes required to be listed in the Top 50 (currently 1000)
C = the mean vote across the whole report (currently 6.8)

for the Top 50, only votes from regular voters are considered.

In order to appear in the Bottom 10 Titles chart the title must have received at least 50 votes.
just memes and donks these days
http://www.soundcloud.com/sherekahnn

Platinum Poster!
User avatar
Posts: 1107
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 12:00 am
Location: Maastricht
Average track rating:
4.0/5 out of 1 votes

Postby Feutus Lapdance » Thu May 28, 2009 9:49 am

S2K08 wrote:TBH, I was getting really sick of seeing those same 5 songs on the main page every time i went on the site, needs to be mixxed up a bit, and If you look at like the top 20/30 all the songs there are prety much killer

THese are the rules for IMDB, and I think the voting system needs to be changed here.

The formula for calculating the Top Rated 50 Titles gives a true Bayesian estimate:

weighted rating (WR) = (v ÷ (v+m)) × R + (m ÷ (v+m)) × C

where:
R = average for the movie (mean) = (Rating)
v = number of votes for the movie = (votes)
m = minimum votes required to be listed in the Top 50 (currently 1000)
C = the mean vote across the whole report (currently 6.8)

for the Top 50, only votes from regular voters are considered.

In order to appear in the Bottom 10 Titles chart the title must have received at least 50 votes.


I have 2 problems with joure system.

1. People dont vote tat mutch.

2.Do we realy want to make some kind of top of the pops? Im not looking for that.

Better would be a deformath ranking. Let the Modderators select some tracks that are well produced and put them on a side of the frond page. So artist that are good (not me, I suck) get somme atension to.

free pwny ridez!
User avatar
Posts: 1075
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:00 am

Postby producer_snafu » Thu May 28, 2009 10:27 am

hardon collider wrote:because people fucking suck. long live machines.


i think this applies to you tbh
\((( "D )))/ Yay clouds! ☁ ☁ ☁ ☁ ☁

Breakcore Member
User avatar
Posts: 90
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 12:00 am

Postby drop_this » Thu May 28, 2009 12:24 pm

S2K08 wrote:TBH, I was getting really sick of seeing those same 5 songs on the main page every time i went on the site, needs to be mixxed up a bit, and If you look at like the top 20/30 all the songs there are prety much killer


Or just change what that Top 5 means. How about Top 5 this month/week?

Better yet, get rid of this gay ass rating competition bullshit. I really don't see how it benefits anyone.

Pwner
User avatar
Posts: 281
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 12:00 am

a 1 is a 10

Postby yonosoyelquesoy » Thu May 28, 2009 1:28 pm

divtech wrote:yeahh jou right, i should just stop bitching haha

You should be glad , because it´s the jealousy of people that cannot drop a decent beat in their whole lifetime...
Haters are everywere in concerts(they yell that you suck or the classic booouu! , bottles in your head, rotten potatoes , whatever...), in mental houses, in work, I mean that is a compliment a 1 is kind of a 10 in a bizarre twisted way you know...

Pwner
User avatar
Posts: 281
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 12:00 am

self pleasure

Postby yonosoyelquesoy » Thu May 28, 2009 1:32 pm

HORSE FORCE wrote:i usually give myself 10's cause i love my own music. other people either dont like it, or they want their track to be ranked higher, so they give it a 1. i dont care what the ratings mean anymore.

now i make tracks and dont release them to anyone cause then the art is for me. pure masturbation. its like that movie with the poet who writes all this beautiful poetry and never releases it because he hates humanity.

okok, i know that comes off as pretentious. i am not really like that. i do hate humanity though.



Masturbation, Im with you on that one.

Elite!
User avatar
Posts: 431
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 12:00 am
Location: hardcorvallis, oregon

Postby cuttingagent » Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:17 am

i think we are failing to consider the possibility that someone disliked the track so much they felt it deserved a one out of ten. i mean, shit guys, it's possible.

but this could just be penis envy talking, as my peepee is so small i could only receive deep throat if it was from a four year old.
([agent.)]

Hardcore Member
User avatar
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 12:00 am

Postby johndecision » Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:52 am

why dont you get rid of the option for people to give a rating of less than 5 if its such a crime against humanity. or better yet, fuck off and stop focus grouping your music via internet message boards.

1337 P0ZT3r
User avatar
Posts: 675
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:00 am
Location: Tri-State

Postby SweetPeaPod » Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:17 pm

horse force hates humanity 'cause he's a horse.
you, you see what i did right there? did ya.... did ya see what i just did?
it all makes sense now.

CoreCore Member
User avatar
Posts: 126
Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 12:00 am

Postby larsby » Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:00 am

SweetPeaPod wrote:horse force hates humanity 'cause he's a horse.
you, you see what i did right there? did ya.... did ya see what i just did?
it all makes sense now.


But horses make delicious hamburgers!

Normal moderator and owner
User avatar
Posts: 2320
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 12:00 am
Average track rating:
4.7/5 out of 6 votes

Postby PEPCORE » Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:48 am

larsby wrote:
SweetPeaPod wrote:horse force hates humanity 'cause he's a horse.
you, you see what i did right there? did ya.... did ya see what i just did?
it all makes sense now.


But horses make delicious hamburgers!


And sausages too.

PreviousNext

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 99 guests